The energy storage Revolution

Reading time 7 minutes HOME


Introduction

The shift from fossil fuel-based energy production to renewable sources is in part, hindered by the intermittent and unpredictable nature of renewable energy production.

How do we keep the lights on when the sun isn't shining and the wind isn't blowing?

This challenge necessitates efficient and reliable energy storage solutions to bridge the intermittency gap and ensure a stable and consistent power supply.

The storage capacity required to integrate renewables varies depending on grid infrastructure and energy mix. To put the energy storage challenge in perspective: according to the International Energy Agency (IEA)'s 2023 report, global electricity consumption reached approximately 25,000 TWh in 2022. To achieve a reliable renewable energy grid, studies by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) suggest that a grid-scale storage capacity of 4-8 hours is needed for most regions depending on their renewable energy mix and consumption patterns. This translates to a massive opportunity - and challenge - in developing and deploying effective energy storage solutions.

Energy storage takes various forms: chemical storage in batteries, mechanical storage in flywheels or pressurized gases, and magnetic storage—most notably in supercapacitors, which use electromagnetic forces to store energy. Each of these technologies has strengths and weaknesses, but what makes them truly fascinating is how their characteristics complement each other, making them incredibly effective if used in a hybrid approach.

A solid grasp of their underlying principles is essential to harnessing these technologies effectively. This article dives into one of the oldest yet most intriguing forms of energy storage: the Flywheel Energy Storage System (FESS). We'll explore its evolution through history, unpack the fundamentals of its design, and highlight its modern applications. Whether you’re an enthusiast or just curious about energy storage systems, this is your gateway to understanding the remarkable world of flywheel technology.

Background

Flywheels have been spinning for thousands of years, with their principle rooted in ancient times. Early devices like the Neolithic spindle and the potter's wheel harnessed rotational inertia to maintain momentum and smooth out rotational motion for tasks such as weaving and pottery. Over time, this principle was adapted to power water wheels, lathes, and hand mills, although primarily for mechanical power transmission rather than dedicated energy storage.

The Industrial Revolution marked a significant advancement in flywheel technology. The shift from wood to metal rotors allowed higher rotational speeds and improved energy storage capacity, enabling their use in steam engines and other industrial machinery. In the 20th century, advancements in materials science and engineering led to a deeper understanding of rotor dynamics and material stresses, allowing for more efficient flywheel designs. However, limitations in energy density and relatively high self-discharge rates compared to emerging battery technologies at the time (lead-acid batteries developed in 1859) led to a decline in the use of flywheels for widespread energy storage applications.

However, breakthroughs in the 1970s introduced three key innovations; the Development of composite materials with superior strength-to-weight ratios to increase durability and energy density. Magnetic bearings that virtually eliminated mechanical friction. And advanced power electronics to enable better speed control and more efficient energy conversion.

Working Principle

FESSs operate by storing energy as rotational kinetic energy in a high-speed spinning rotor. The principle is deceptively simple: during the charging process, power electronics direct electrical energy to a motor, which accelerates the rotor to very high speeds, often reaching tens of thousands of revolutions per minute (RPM). This rotational energy is retained within the flywheel system as kinetic energy.

When energy is needed, the system switches to discharge mode. The motor operates as a generator, converting the stored rotational kinetic energy back into electrical energy. As the kinetic energy is extracted, the rotor slows down proportionally. This seamless transition between motor and generator modes is managed by advanced power electronics, ensuring efficient energy conversion and minimal energy loss.

The amount of energy stored is directly proportional to the rotor's moment of inertia (I) and the square of its rotational velocity (ω), as described by the following equation:

E = (1/2)Iω² (1)

From the equation, it can be deduced that energy storage increases linearly with the moment of inertia but exponentially with angular velocity (ω). This makes increasing the rotor speed a more effective method to enhance energy density compared to merely increasing the moment of inertia.

The moment of inertia (I) depends on both the mass (m) and the distribution of that mass relative to the axis of rotation. For a solid cylinder rotating about its central axis, the moment of inertia is given by:

I = (1/2)mr² (2)

where r is the radius of the cylinder. This shows that increasing the radius exponentially increases the moment of inertia, and mass linearly. However, there are practical limits to both increasing the radius and the rotational speed. As the rotor spins faster and/or becomes larger, it experiences increasing tensile stresses due to centrifugal forces. These stresses can lead to rotor failure if they exceed the material's tensile strength.

The maximum tensile stress (σmax) a rotor can withstand is proportional to the square of its radius (r) and angular velocity (ω), as well as the material's density (ρ), defined by:

σmax = Kρr²ω² (3)

where K is a dimensionless constant that depends on the rotor's shape. For a theoretical "Laval disc" (a disc with a specific profile designed for uniform stress), K = 1. Practical rotor shapes typically have K values ranging from 0.6 to 0.8 to manage stress concentrations.

Using the maximum tensile strength and the K value, the energy density of a FESS can be calculated as:

E/m =K σmax / (ρ) (4)

This equation highlights the trade-offs in flywheel design: while increasing speed and radius improves energy storage, material selection, and shape optimization are critical to prevent mechanical failure. Recent advances in materials science and rotor design aim to push these boundaries, making FESS a more viable option for high-performance energy storage.

The energy delivered by a flywheel to a load is influenced by several factors, including the efficiency of the power electronics, control algorithms, the electric machine (motor/generator), and self-discharge losses. These losses arise primarily from friction (including aerodynamic drag and bearing friction) and, to a lesser extent, hysteresis losses in the motor/generator core. Temperature effects can also play a role, particularly in the performance of power electronics and bearing lubricants (if applicable).

Several electric machine types are suitable for flywheel energy storage, each with distinct trade-offs:

To minimize self-discharge losses due to aerodynamic drag, the rotor is typically housed within a vacuum or near-vacuum enclosure. This housing is often constructed from robust materials (e.g., high-strength steel, composites) not only to maintain the vacuum but also as a crucial safety measure to contain rotor fragments in the event of a failure. The housing also often incorporates a cooling system to manage heat generated by the electric machine and any residual friction. Effective sealing is essential to minimize the frequency of vacuum pump operation and maintain efficient operation.

FESSs employ various bearing technologies to support the rotor with minimal friction:

Energy Storage characteristics

The direct conversion of electrical energy into mechanical energy in FESS technology results in minimal energy transfer delay, enabling a fast and highly responsive system. Unlike chemical batteries, which generate heat due to electrochemical reactions, flywheels operate without significant thermal losses during energy transfer. Furthermore, the absence of chemical reactions ensures minimal wear, allowing flywheels to achieve millions of charge-discharge cycles with negligible degradation.

Energy storage in FESS relies on the principles of rotational kinetic energy, making it inherently less sensitive to temperature fluctuations compared to chemical batteries. This results in predictable performance based on well-understood physics, eliminating concerns related to chemical instability or capacity loss under extreme conditions.These characteristics make FESS highly suitable for a variety of applications, particularly those requiring high power density and rapid response times. One of the most prominent applications is grid stabilization. FESS can respond instantaneously to frequency fluctuations in the power grid, helping maintain stability and ensuring efficient energy distribution. Companies like Amber Kinetics and Torus Power have demonstrated the effectiveness of FESS in providing grid-scale energy storage solutions with minimal environmental impact.

In hybrid energy storage systems, FESS complements lithium-ion batteries by handling short-duration, high-power demands. This reduces the frequency and depth of discharge cycles for lithium-ion batteries, effectively doubling their operational lifespan. By mitigating wear on chemical batteries, FESS not only enhances system reliability but also lowers the total cost of ownership for hybrid energy systems.

Challenges

So why aren't flywheels everywhere?

Flywheels offer high power density, enabling them to deliver energy rapidly. However, their energy density is significantly lower compared to competing technologies. While modern lithium-ion batteries can store around 100–250 Wh/kg, flywheels typically store 10–50 Wh/kg, meaning batteries can store substantially more energy per unit of mass. This limitation restricts flywheels to applications requiring short bursts of high power rather than long-duration energy storage.

However, the cost of these advanced materials and the associated manufacturing processes remains a significant barrier to widespread adoption. Additionally, the production of flywheel systems requires precision engineering, particularly for the rotor and components like magnetic bearings and vacuum enclosures. These demands not only increase upfront costs but can also pose maintenance challenges, as systems must be carefully monitored and maintained to prevent performance degradation or failure.

Future Work

While FESS faces challenges, ongoing research and development are addressing these limitations and expanding its potential. Key areas of future work include:

Flywheel Energy Storage offers a compelling solution for specific energy storage needs, particularly those requiring high power, fast response, and long cycle life. While challenges related to energy density and cost remain, ongoing advancements in materials, bearing technologies, and system design are steadily improving FESS performance and making them more competitive. As the demand for grid-scale energy storage continues to grow, FESS is poised to play a crucial role in enabling a more stable and sustainable energy future, especially within hybrid energy storage systems. Its unique combination of rapid response and long cycle life makes it a valuable asset in balancing the intermittency of renewable energy sources and ensuring grid stability.

References

  1. International Energy Agency (IEA). World Energy world-energy-outlook-2023.
  2. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) .
  3. Applied Sciences -A Review of Flywheel Energy Storage System Technologies and Their Applications Mustafa E. Amiryar and Keith R. Pullen
  4. Science Direct -A comprehensive review of Flywheel Energy Storage System technology S.M. Mousavi Ga,n , Faramarz Faraji b,c , Abbas Majazi d , Kamal Al-Haddad e
  5. Science Direct-Flywheel energy storage—An upswing technology for energy sustainability Haichang Liu , Jihai Jiang
  6. Joule- FUTURE ENERGY The Status and Future of Flywheel Energy Storage Keith R. Pullen1,